Monday, November 22, 2010
Public has until Nov 22 to comment on FDA Approval of GMO salmon - Also, latest update on SB 510, one post down, as of 9:15 pm 11/22
How to take action TODAY - Nov. 22 is last official day for public comment!
More from the Center for Food Safety on the poor research, and all the information concealed from the public by for-profit Aqua Bounty on, potentially, the first genetically modified animal to be ok'd for food production - and why is this animal being put up for approval as a drug, doing an end-run around tougher food regulations?
More on that as of 11/22 from Duke University researchers HERE.
Legislation proposed 11/18/10 by Senators Begich (D-AK), Murkowski (I-AK), and Murray(D-AK) re: GMO salmon.
Sunday, November 21, 2010
UPDATE ON SB 510 (Updated last at 9:15 pm, 11/22/10)
Here is the latest information on SB 510 from the Cornucopia Institute and the Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance:
Here are two other pieces of news on the bill, one from Food Democracy Now and from the Farm to Consumer Defense Fund (FTCDF).
Links:
Food Democracy Now:
http://www.fooddemocracynow. org/blog/2010/nov/18/ compromise-reached-tester- amendment-consumer-group/
FTCLDF:
http://ftcldf.org/search- results.html?cx= 003694308739973790001% 3Atguqrmds2da&cof=FORID%3A11& q=tester&sa=Go#901
Photos: Slow Food Nation garden, City hall, SF CA. Squash from Land & Sea school garden, Friday Harbor, WA. L Degnan Cobos
"Even though an agreement was reached on the Tester-Hagan amendment last week, by the leadership in the Senate, this issue in the food safety bill is still not over!
The Tester-Hagan amendment would exempt smaller, organic and local growers from expensive regulatory burdens.
For over a year, the big Agribusiness trade organizations have supported passage of S.510, the Food Safety Modernization Act. From agribusiness’s perspective, the bill was a win-win: they could absorb the costs of the regulations because of their size; they'd gain good PR for supposedly improving food safety practices, gain some protection from legal liabilities—and hobble the competition—local food producers by crushing them with new regulatory burdens.
Their anti-competitive motivation was only speculation until now. But when the Senators agreed to include the Tester-Hagan amendment in the bill, to exempt small-scale direct-marketing producers from some of the most burdensome provisions, agribusiness revealed its true colors. Late last week, twenty agribusiness lobby groups fired off a letter stating that they would oppose the bill if it included the Tester-Hagan amendment.
The letter from the agribusiness groups states: “[B]y incorporating the Tester amendment in the bill, consumers will be left vulnerable to the gaping holes and uneven application of the law created by these exemptions. In addition, it sets an unfortunate precedent for future action on food safety policy by Congress that science and risk based standards can be ignored.”
The full letter can be viewed at:
What science and risk? No one has produced any data or evidence of any widespread problems caused by local producers and marketed directly to consumers. All of the major foodborne illness outbreaks have been caused by products that went through the long supply chains of corporate agribusiness, many emanating from factory-scale farms.
Agribusiness’s real concern about the Tester-Hagan amendment isn’t food safety, but the precedent set by having Congress recognize that small, direct-marketing producers are different, and should be regulated differently, from the large Agribusinesses.
Corporate agribusiness is trying to convince the Senators to pull the Tester-Hagan amendment back out. While the amendment is currently part of the “Managers’ Package” – the amended version of the bill agreed to by six bipartisan sponsors – nothing is certain until the actual vote.
This Thanksgiving week, please take a moment to call or email your Senators to tell them to hold firm on KEEPING the Tester-Hagan amendment part of the bill. The legislation will likely come up for a vote when they go back into session early next week.
You can call the Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121 or go to www.senate.gov to find your Senator’s website (if the phone lines are busy, the best way to reach them is through the "contact" page on their website)"
Prepared by the staff of The Cornucopia Institute and the Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance
Here are two other pieces of news on the bill, one from Food Democracy Now and from the Farm to Consumer Defense Fund (FTCDF).
Links:
Food Democracy Now:
http://www.fooddemocracynow.
FTCLDF:
http://ftcldf.org/search-
Photos: Slow Food Nation garden, City hall, SF CA. Squash from Land & Sea school garden, Friday Harbor, WA. L Degnan Cobos
Friday, November 19, 2010
URGENT Message from the Farm to Consumer Legal Defense Fund & FOOD DEMOCRACY NOW
| ||
|
S.510 will expand FDA's jurisdiction over intrastate commerce and impose one-size-fits-all regulations that will make it difficult for many small businesses to survive. See Talking Points at the end.
How bad can a federal food safety bill be? Let me count the ways! Better yet, let Senator Coburn give you a short video
FDA's failure to exercise its current powers hardly justifies rewarding the agency with expanded authority in the aftermath of the egg recall and peanut butter fiasco.
Moreover, FDA has proven itself untrustworthy to operate in the best interest of the American public as clearly seen in allowing the nontherapeutic use of antibiotics in animals and its lax policy regarding genetically modified foods.
Congress needs to get the message: Solve the real food safety problems--the centralized food distribution system and imported foods--and not regulate our local food sources out of business.
Go to www.farmtoconsumer.org/
Tell your Senators to protect local foods and vote against S.510.
To see these points as quick talking points, go HERE
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


